Many people, including BuffaloPundit, believe that justice was served by the hanging of Saddam Hussein. If this is true, there are others who conspired with Saddam Hussein and deserve the same fate. There are questions that must be answered and not ignored if this whole sordid chapter in our history is to have any real value for the future. Saddam, the Butcher of Baghdad, was created by the United States government. Hussein’s crimes do not stand alone, he was aided and abetted by the United States government.
Who encouraged Saddam to invade Iran in 1980, which was the greatest war crime he has committed for it led to the deaths of a million and a half souls? And who sold him the components for the chemical weapons with which he drenched Iran and the Kurds? We did. No wonder the Americans, who controlled Saddam’s weird trial, forbad any mention of this, his most obscene atrocity, in the charges against him. Could he not have been handed over to the Iranians for sentencing for this massive war crime? Of course not. Because that would also expose our culpability.
And the mass killings we perpetrated in 2003 with our depleted uranium shells and our “bunker buster” bombs and our phosphorous, the murderous post-invasion sieges of Fallujah and Najaf, the hell-disaster of anarchy we unleashed on the Iraqi population in the aftermath of our “victory” - our “mission accomplished” - who will be found guilty of this? Such expiation as we might expect will come, no doubt, in the self-serving memoirs of Blair and Bush, written in comfortable and wealthy retirement.
Saddam, in the face of death, knew that he will be viewed as a martyr.
At first, those who suffered from Saddam’s cruelty will welcome his execution. Hundreds wanted to pull the hangman’s lever. So will many other Kurds and Shia outside Iraq welcome his end. But they - and millions of other Muslims - will remember how he was informed of his death sentence at the dawn of the Eid al-Adha feast, which recalls the would-be sacrifice by Abraham, of his son, a commemoration which even the ghastly Saddam cynically used to celebrate by releasing prisoners from his jails. “Handed over to the Iraqi authorities,” he may have been before his death. But his execution will go down - correctly - as an American affair and time will add its false but lasting gloss to all this - that the West destroyed an Arab leader who no longer obeyed his orders from Washington, that, for all his wrongdoing (and this will be the terrible get-out for Arab historians, this shaving away of his crimes) Saddam died a “martyr” to the will of the new “Crusaders”.
This 1983 photo says it all.













1BuffaloPundit on Dec 30, 2006 at 6:31 am:
While true that we supported Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war, the US didn’t tell him to commit genocide on Kurds or Shias. That was all Saddam. Furthermore, Saddam came to power in a coup in 1968, and in 1979 he consolidated his power and promptly purged the Ba’ath party by killing 21 high-ranking members. We didn’t make him do that.
2Michael Rebmann on Dec 30, 2006 at 6:58 am:
The whole Middle East mess is very disturbing, no matter how you look at it. Saddam certainly was no angel. However, I don’t think anyone can look at the conditions in Iraq now, and over the past few years, and say that the people of Iraq are better off because we deposed him. There is a lot of guilt to be spread around for actions in and by Iraq under Saddam Hussein. After all the years supporting Hussein, the decision to invade Iraq during Hussein’s relatively “calm” period of rule is suspect at best.